WN
2006-08-02 13:56:35 UTC
Hi,
In doing my Latex to Context conversion, I stumbled on two Latex math
commands : \overset and \underset
as in
\mathcal{T} = \overset{\infty}{ \underset{r,s = 0}{\cup} } \:
\mathcal{T}^{r}_s
The page http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math_with_amsl mentions the
commands stackrel and underset
when using the AMSL module from Giuseppe Bilotta.
I tried to load the AMSL module with \usemodule[amsl] like to test
its workings.
\usemodule[amsl]
\starttext
\startformula
T = { \underset{r,s = 0}{\cup} } \: T^{r}_{s}
\stopformula
\stoptext
but the log file indicates it cannot find the module amsl ???
Is the AMSL module not part of the standard Context distribution ? I
thought it was.
I am using ConTeXt ver: 2006.07.24 10:49 fmt: 2006.7.27 int: english
mes: english.
Kind regards
Wim Neimeijer
In doing my Latex to Context conversion, I stumbled on two Latex math
commands : \overset and \underset
as in
\mathcal{T} = \overset{\infty}{ \underset{r,s = 0}{\cup} } \:
\mathcal{T}^{r}_s
The page http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math_with_amsl mentions the
commands stackrel and underset
when using the AMSL module from Giuseppe Bilotta.
I tried to load the AMSL module with \usemodule[amsl] like to test
its workings.
\usemodule[amsl]
\starttext
\startformula
T = { \underset{r,s = 0}{\cup} } \: T^{r}_{s}
\stopformula
\stoptext
but the log file indicates it cannot find the module amsl ???
Is the AMSL module not part of the standard Context distribution ? I
thought it was.
I am using ConTeXt ver: 2006.07.24 10:49 fmt: 2006.7.27 int: english
mes: english.
Kind regards
Wim Neimeijer